Monday, March 14, 2016

Primordial oscillations, an alternative mechanism to the Big Bang

Microwave anisotropy map of the universe


Big Bang is the scientifically accepted theory for the initial formation of the universe. The model accounts for the gargantuan size of the universe and its apparently perfectly even distribution. To solve the presumably extremely high initial density with the resulting uniform structure all over space, an immense and sudden increase in size, explosion, has been put forward. A faster bang, called inflation, was suggested to accommodate observations that showed an extremely smooth distribution of the large-scale structure in the cosmos. However, the driving force of inflation is missing, and the mechanism conflicts on many points with the microwave background radiation. Below I introduce an alternative possibility that can generate a uniform matter distribution throughout the visible cosmos, and it is also coherent with the microwave background radiation.

The book ‘The science of consciousness’ shows that the universe's primordial energy is formed by one-dimensional string vibrations. Therefore string theory replaces Big Bang as the originator of the cosmos. Because primordial string vibrations preceded stable spatial structure, temperature, or pressure, they could occur with abundance and fluidity. The kinetic energy of string fluctuations would generate compactification and insulation by a smooth, symmetric, and information blocking the horizon. The energy needs that formed compact dimensions calibrated the constant energy level of space. The compact dimension formation would give rise to the first interactions, time zero of the universe. Interaction, an energy-requiring volume exchange between space and the compact dimensions, stabilized the spatial structure. This is the birth of interacting fermions and the beginning of time.



The time progression from left to right shows the gradual formation of foam (credit: NSF)


The latest cosmological data show a filament structure on the largest scales of the universe, congruent with string oscillations. The above mechanism also fits well with the cosmic background radiation measurements, which shows that the curvature of space is nearly flat, and the fluctuations show almost Gaussian (even) distribution. The series of pictures above indicate how the parallel evolution of gravity-bound structures with the expansion of space. Without a stable spatial field, lissome string fluctuations could not have given rise to gravitational waves. Consequently, Big Bang gravitational waves cannot be detected with even our current, sophisticated technology. (The recently discovered gravitational waves are the result of a black hole collision.) The decreasing amplitude oscillations could very well calibrate the constant energy level of space and, at the moment of creation, spike the temperature, allowing recombination and nucleosynthesis. The high temperature would drive spatial expansion. Secondary interactions would give rise to a foamy structure. This simple mechanism can eliminate many problems that plague the theory of Big Bang and inflation.

Problems with the standard model of Cosmology are listed in a recent publication...

Want to learn more? More information can be found in my book, The science of consciousness.


The Science of Consciousness Post, your news about the mind
The Science of Consciousness, please join the discussion
Website: evadeli


Copyright © 2017 by Eva Deli

1 comment:

  1. See the alternative of the UNIVERSE in Synthese’s article (USA, 2005) and my Springer’s book (Germany 2015/2016): the “Universe” does not exist, it cannot have any ontology! What really exist are “entities” and their “interactions”. The wrong framework, the “Universe”/“world” is replaced with a new framework the “Epistemologically Different Worlds” (for quantum mechanics, the micro-macro relation, the mind-brain problem, emergence, levels, etc.) (IT IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN EVERETT’s APPROACH!!)

    All my main ideas (the mind-brain problem, main problems of cognitive science and quantum mechanics, Einstein’s relativity vs. quantum mechanics, etc.) from my Springer’s book (2015) can be found in my PhD thesis (2007), UNSW (Sydney, Australia, officially posted on university’s website, FREE, by the university’s Staff in 2007) https://www.unsworks.unsw.edu.au/primo-explore/fulldisplay?vid=UNSWORKS&docid=unsworks_5143&context=L

    My book at SPRINGER (Germany): "Illusions of Human Thinking (2015/2016) - On concepts of Mind, Reality, and Universe in Psychology, Neuroscience and Physics" [manuscript sent to Springer in 2014 and first published (online) in October 2015; on the cover is written 2016! WHY?]: quantum theory is a pseudo-theory, the mind-brain (life-organism) problem is a pseudo-problem, cognitive neuroscience is a pseudo-science, the ontology of special and general theory of relativity (without “spacetime”), ‘life’ in Biology, mental representation, “levels”, etc. This book = summary of the main ideas of my PhD thesis published in 2007 + my first FIVE books (English), all FREE at my webpage! http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gabriel_vacariu/ Many books/articles FREE here
    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gabriel_Vacariu/publications

    Gabriel Vacariu, (June 2020 to 2014) The UNBELIEVABLE SIMILARITIES between the ideas of some people (2011-2016) and my ideas (2002-2008) in physics (quantum mechanics, cosmology), cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, and philosophy (this manuscript would require a REVOLUTION in international academy environment!) here
    https://www.academia.edu/s/0c1502ea90 ;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340621608_April_2020_2014_Gabriel_Vacariu_UNBELIEVABLE_similarities_odf https://philpapers.org/rec/VACAT-2

    (During last FIVE years, I have sent this updated manuscript to thousands of people from many countries in each year! The thieves have no chances!!!)
    With my EDWs perspective, I have changed EVERYTHING in Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy! It is about TWO Nobel prizes… (see how many physicists, cognitive neuroscientists, and philosophers published UNBELIEVABLE SIMILAR ideas to my ideas many years later!)

    ReplyDelete