Copyright © 2026 by Eva Deli
Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Is major depressive disorder a disease of energy?
Sunday, March 1, 2026
How close are we to true AI?
Understanding consciousness is the ultimate prize for creators of artificial intelligence. Nevertheless, consciousness theory will also shape how we view ourselves and our place in the world. Although AI systems can mimic human reasoning, they can only regurgitate the input data. They are sophisticated pattern recognizers and content remixers, but cannot step beyond the limitations of the input. Understanding consciousness would enable us to transition from synthetic to synthesis, unlocking unlimited potential.
Computer scientists hope that recurrent computation will somehow 'awaken' code to consciousness. Yet the spectacular achievements of large language and diffusion models have not moved beyond imitation. We train models on the outputs of consciousness—our language, our art, our logic—while remaining entirely ignorant of the process that produces them. An AI can write a gut-wrenching paragraph about sadness by replicating patterns, vocabulary, and syntax. But it knows nothing of grief. It can create a shadow play, yet knows nothing of the object that casts it. This imitation, while impressive, should not be mistaken for a proper understanding of consciousness. No amount of coloring can turn the shadow into a solid object.
To reverse-engineer the mind, we need a blueprint. The pressing need to advance AI is a physicalist theory of consciousness, the architecture of subjective experience itself. The Fermionic Mind Hypothesis (FMH) is such a physicalist framework. It posits that selfhood is structurally and functionally analogous to a fermion in physics. The self's persistent core operates as an energy-regulating system, maintaining mental equilibrium through continuous thermodynamic cycles. Within this cycle, cognitive processes such as decision-making are wave-particle transitions that capture the inherent nondeterminism and contextual collapse of probabilistic mental states.
#AI #Consciousness
Copyright © 2026 by Eva Deli
Sunday, January 25, 2026
The Mind as a Particle: The Fermionic Mind Hypothesis
The Fermionic Mind Hypothesis is not a complex codename for the mind, but a way to explain its many facets: the power of emotions and how the same stimulus can lead to either stress or spiritual growth. By understanding the physics of the mind, we can become masters of our destiny.
To understand this new theory, we have to break two common misconceptions.
Misconception #1: We are totally in control.
The mind is a particle—like an electron—and it is regulated by its environment. Imagine an electron moving through a magnetic field. The electron doesn't decide where to go; the field pushes and pulls it, guiding its path. In the same way, our mind is influenced by the 'fields' around us: our home, our job, our stress levels, and our society. Recognizing this can empower you to understand how your environment shapes your thoughts and behaviors.
Pressure and heat increase the speed of the electrons, while expansion and cold reduce it. Likewise, we often respond to external pressure with anxiety. Our heart rate and blood pressure go up. In contrast, we respond to beauty and order by calming down. We literally slow down. Both of these conditions reorganize the brain. Anxiety pushes us toward uncertainty, while beauty and order allow us to grow and mature.
So, if we are just passive particles being pushed around by life, why are people from all walks of life able to pursue their dreams? Why do we learn? How can we strive to reach our goals? Our brain cannot change the incoming sensory information, but we can change how we manage it. Acceptance allows the mind to become calm despite a stressful environment. Moreover, it allows the brain to reorganize itself and become more resistant to stress. In this view, wisdom is the physical result of your brain regulating its stress response.
Intellectual growth is a survival mechanism in a chaotic world, and understanding this can motivate you to pursue growth despite external pressures.
Misconception #2: We have Free Will.
Philosophers have argued for centuries about "Free Will" vs. "Determinism." We do not control our environment. Instead, our environment regulates us. We are pushed and pulled by our history, our upbringing (the "fields" we grew up in). Thus, trying to change bad habits requires overcoming the inertia of your own mind. The ancient Stoics and Buddhists were right: We cannot control our environment, but we can control how we process the information it provides.
This theory tells us we aren't the "kings" of the universe, as we thought we were. We are smaller, yet more connected. We are not just observers. We are active participants in this grand physics experiment. And if we understand its rules, we can become the masters of our world.
Copyright © 2026 by Eva Deli
Thursday, December 11, 2025
What is Psychological Spin? An emotional connection
Some days you might feel focused, creative, and ready to tackle the future, while other days you're stuck ruminating on past regrets and feeling drained. The answer to that question might lie in psychological spin. This concept proposes that our emotional state is governed by a thermodynamic cycle, much like an engine, and the direction of that cycle determines our overall attitude and functioning.
Monday, November 17, 2025
Why Our Feelings Follow the Laws of Physics
Monday, August 11, 2025
How do emotions drive motivation?
Why do we feel? What are emotions? What pushes us to act? And why does time seem to fly when we're having fun, only to drag on when we're anxious? A new manuscript, "Feeling the Heat: A Thermodynamic Perspective on Emotions, Motivation, and Time Perception," presents a comprehensive unified theory that connects these fundamental aspects of our experience through the laws of physics. It suggests that our mental world, much like the physical world, is governed by the principles of energy and entropy.
At its core, this novel model shows that deviations from our bodily or mental equilibrium are experienced as emotion, much like a fever is a deviation from our normal body temperature. This perspective treats our neural system as constantly seeking balance. The mental resting state is a high-entropy balance, full of potential and flexibility. Any stimulus—a sudden noise, a welcome surprise, or a stressful thought—pushes us away from this equilibrium, and that energetic ripple is what we experience as an emotion.
In this view, motivation is regulated by our perception of time. For instance, positive emotions, such as joy, can actually reduce our motivation to act, as we are content with our current state. In contrast, stressful emotions like anxiety or anger involve a high level of cognitive processing and create a sense of 'time pressure.' Our sense of misery at the negative feelings we experience fuels impatience. This impatience creates an urgency to act, to resolve the situation, and to regain balance.
A fascinating aspect of this theory is how the identical slowing down of time perception can create contrasting motivation. The slowed time of contentment allows for relaxation and appreciation, while the slowed time of stress creates a feeling of being trapped, fueling impatience. However, when we do act, our perception of time accelerates to manage fluid performance. This interplay explains how we can enter a 'flow state,' a unique condition at the intersection of contentment and challenge. In this fully absorbed, motivated state, time flies.
By anchoring psychology in the physical principles of energy and entropy, this manuscript presents a novel approach to understanding how emotions drive motivation. This perspective has significant implications, particularly for mental health. It reframes conditions like depression and anxiety not as chemical imbalances, but as states of thermodynamic dysregulation, where energy-draining loops leave the brain in a low-energy state. This thermodynamic model explains why emotional suppression is ineffective. It demonstrates why meditation and cognitive focus on the present moment enhance the mind's natural ability to regulate its energy, manage stress, and achieve a healthy mental equilibrium.
Friday, July 11, 2025
The Price of Thought: Why current AIs Will Never Be Conscious
Friday, March 7, 2025
Consciousness and the Making of Mind: Decoding the Engine of Thought
The wonder of the mind's nature is at the core of our humanity. William James, often regarded as the grandfather of
consciousness studies, challenged the traditional view of consciousness as a passive, purely
mental phenomenon. He argued instead that the mind is deeply intertwined with
bodily movement and sensory feedback. He thought that cognitive processes are
inherently purposeful and directed towards action. While stimulus constantly
evolves consciousness, consciousness actively participates in the world through
physical actions.
He recognized how seemingly abstract thoughts and emotions
are rooted in motor activity. For instance, thinking is not solely a mental process but is also connected to subtle muscular movements, such as those in the throat or eyes. This
inherent connection to action led him to the concept of consciousness as a
motor, a metaphorical framework that emphasizes consciousness' active and dynamic
nature. In this concept, experience is a fundamentally motor-driven, active process that originates in perception, compelled by the senses and bodily sensations.
The brain's perception of the environment triggers memory
and reaction, which deeply intertwines consciousness with its physical
surroundings. Through these physical interactions with the world, consciousness
guides behavior, helping organisms adapt to their environment. This interplay
shapes our thoughts and alters the world, fostering a harmonious, parallel
evolution of mind and matter.
For example, the sensory experience of a forest, with its
rustling leaves, scents, and breezes, brings up memories—fragments on our
mental scaffolds, such as a childhood camping trip. These past experiences
formed the preferred pathways of the brain's physical wiring, representing a platform
for the present. Thus, we process the present through the lens of the past. The experience, such as clearing the ground for the tent, affects the environment in a constant feedback loop, with each influencing the other. External
stimuli trigger perception, inspiring actions to shape our world.
But how does this process work? We can take James' idea of
consciousness as a motor further. In contrast to a motor that uses an external
power source to create motion, the brain is more like an engine, a machine that
burns fuel to generate motion. However, the engine's speed depends on fuel intake, while
the brain's activation changes with stimulus, not its energy supply. The
brain's generous glucose supply is constant whether we're solving a complex
math problem, daydreaming, or fast asleep. The steady energy flow ensures
smooth information transmission, like oiling a motor reduces friction. In this
analogy, stimuli are the fuel that powers the mind's engine.
James' concept of the mind as a motor underscores the dynamic role of consciousness in its environment. However, the constantly engaged mind uses the information from the stimulus as fuel. Therefore, consciousness is an information-processing engine. Like a well-oiled machine, this 'consciousness engine' efficiently processes and stores information as memories and experiences. These memories can serve as a constantly changing mental scaffolding, guiding the interpretation of our experiences. This perspective bridges the gap between the mind and its environment, offering a dynamic and pragmatic understanding of consciousness as a physical entity. Viewing consciousness as a physical organization provides a compelling perspective on the potential of artificial intelligence.
Image credit: Nathan Cowley
Monday, February 17, 2025
The Science of Emotions: Understanding Psychological Bias
The human brain, a marvel of biological engineering, is a metabolic powerhouse. Although it constitutes a mere 2% of our body weight, it consumes nearly 20% of its energy. This energy is dedicated to information processing, constantly resetting to a resting state characterized by low-frequency brain activations. Like the quiet hum of an engine running in the background, the resting state is the brain's "idle mode," a stable, self-referential baseline that underpins our sense of identity and belief systems. But what maintains this equilibrium? The answer lies in emotional feedback. Far from being abstract or ephemeral, emotions are dynamic forces embedded in our autonomic and motivational networks. Like a thermostat adjusting a room's temperature, emotions continually assess our physical, cultural, and social needs by setting our external environment against the backdrop of our memories.
Emotions
ripple through every system of our body. They influence our hormonal pathways,
triggering physical responses such as an increased heart rate, sweating, and
muscle tension. These physiological changes, in turn, feed back into our
emotional and mental regulation, continuously modulating our cognitive state. This intricate interplay makes categorizing emotions inherently challenging. Nevertheless, their tone frequencies and energy signatures allow for a broad classification into positive and negative states—a duality
reminiscent of the bipolar spin in fermions—a concept in quantum physics.
Psychological Spin: A Bridge to Quantum Mechanics
Fermions are particles with half-integer spins, spinning
in two directions—forming an
"up" or "down" state. These opposing states give rise to attraction
or repulsion between particles, preventing identical fermions from occupying
the same quantum state. The repulsion is
the essence of the Pauli exclusion principle and explains why matter
cannot be infinitely compressed; it's the reason stars shine and atoms retain
structure. This model of spin dynamics transcends the atomic scale,
providing a metaphorical framework for analyzing social interactions. Individual emotions often come down to for or
against attitudes, similar to binary spin states. As
strangers crowd in an elevator, their discomfort is a visceral need for
personal space mirroring fermionic repulsion. The
competitive drive in social situations or the need to assert personal space
mirrors the repulsive forces observed in atomic interactions, giving rise to society's
complex, hierarchical structures.
Emotional bipolarity led to the concept of psychological spin, a term that captures our inherent disposition—for or against—every
experience we encounter. Up psychological spin, associated with
learning, acceptance, or contentment, enhances neural complexity and fosters
adaptability. It encourages the formation of novel connections, promoting
creative thinking, persistence, and resilience. Conversely, down psychological spin, often linked to stressful states like fear or frustration, narrows cognitive flexibility, leading to rigid or repetitive thought patterns that reduce patience and hinder problem-solving. Psychological
spin can have long-term consequences, producing a recall bias by bringing
forth memories that match our mood.
The concept of the spinor, a fascinating outcome of spin,
takes this analogy further. Unlike ordinary
objects, a spinor undergoes a peculiar sign change upon completing a full
rotation. This property mirrors the way our emotional experiences can
completely reverse their meaning in a different context. For example, a gentle
caress from a loved one can evoke warmth and security. At the same time, in the
context of past trauma, it triggers fear or disgust. Similarly, a compliment
might be embraced as a genuine affirmation in one setting but interpreted as
cynical or insincere in another. These emotional reversals highlight the brain's
remarkable capacity to reinterpret and reverse its attitude—much like the
transformation of a spinor when subjected to a complete rotational cycle.
Classical (top) and quantum (bottom) turns
Conclusion
Viewing emotions through the lens of physics offers a robust
framework for understanding the chaotic interplay of our internal states. Much
like a gyroscope senses tilt, emotions
are vital indicators of bodily and psychological imbalances, guiding the brain
as it adapts to a constantly changing environment. The psychological spin offers
a more nuanced understanding of our emotional lives and deepens our
appreciation for the dynamic nature of human cognition. It opens up innovative
avenues for addressing mental health challenges and developing technologies
that interface directly with our cognitive processes.
The book Emotional Reasoning: Insight into the Conscious Experience is published on August 30, 2024.
To order:
Amazon BooksWednesday, July 31, 2024
How Important is Emotional Reasoning?
Thursday, May 2, 2024
The Fermionic Mind Hypothesis, a novel consciousness theory
Consciousness is integral to human individuality and social existence and is a cornerstone of our remarkable technological, social, and cultural progress. The pursuit of understanding consciousness goes beyond everyday science and philosophy to reality's very essence and nature.
Exploring consciousness is a journey that transcends epochs and cultures, starting from mystical, spiritual, or religious significance. Descartes' idea of dualism posited that the mind and body were distinct. However, significant advancements in neuroscience, such as brain imaging and empirical science, have connected the manifestations of consciousness to specific brain activations, with the global workspace and integrated information theory (IIT) dominating the conversation. Although intriguing, the theories fail to offer a satisfactory model of consciousness.
As we strive to imbue artificial systems with consciousness-like capabilities, the nature of consciousness becomes an increasingly urgent question. While there are significant differences between the topological architecture of large language models (LLMs) and the neurobiological details of circuits empirically linked to consciousness in mammals, the possibility that future LLMs may achieve consciousness motivates us to turn to physics for a common thread between these artificial and biologically based intellects.
The Fermionic Mind Hypothesis (FMH) is a novel consciousness theory. FMH synthesizes the insights of existing interdisciplinary approaches, encompassing neuroscience, psychology, philosophy, computer science, and even quantum physics, into a physical consciousness model. A model of consciousness as a particle can clarify various characteristics of consciousness, including the subjective feeling of separation, the role of the observer, and the challenge of managing our thoughts and emotions. Moreover, the contrast between constant self-identity and probabilistic perception resembles wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics.
The principles governing the smallest building blocks of matter, fermions, are mirrored in the workings of the mind. Perception is a reverse thermodynamic cycle that drives cognitive change by altering synaptic complexity. The direction of the mental cycle represents intrinsic motivation and is analogous to spin. Reversing the cycle creates an exothermic process that dissipates energy and degrades intellect. The fermionic organization provides emotions with a powerful action-producing capacity analogous to the elemental forces in physics.
The hypothesis is an elegant and testable framework with profound implications for philosophy and social policy. Understanding the nature of consciousness could offer insights into mental and neurological disorders and would impact our ability to define animal consciousness in neuroscience and medicine. It would help us create AI systems with more human-like intelligence, empathy, decision-making abilities, and sentience. It could hint at why consciousness evolved, what it means for our existence, the nature of reality, and our place in the universe. It can shed light on spiritual experiences and transcendence and demonstrate that consciousness is a fundamental building block of nature woven into the fabric of reality.
Monday, March 18, 2024
Should we worry about the changes brought about by AI?
Listen to the post:
At the time when writing was primarily reserved for official and religious documents, philosophers polished their craft through meticulous oral arguments. The advent of papyrus expanded access to recorded knowledge, which raised concerns for Plato: "For this invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds of those who learn to use it because they will not practice their memory. Their trust in writing, produced by external characters which are no part of themselves, will discourage the use of their own memory within them." Plato feared that writing would supplant memorization, potentially leading to intellectual decline. Plato was right that writing made memorization of long passages redundant, but it preserved ancient knowledge, including Plato's ideas.
For a thousand years after Plato, writing remained the exclusive privilege of the aristocracy, priests, and clergy until Gutenberg invented the printing press. This marked a significant turning point in history, democratizing access to written knowledge and creating a demand for literacy. The widespread availability of the Bible fostered a new sense of brotherhood, equality, and human dignity, as expressed in the New Testament.
With the emergence of AI, we stand at the brink of another transformative era, with the potential to reshape society just as profoundly as the writing or the printing press did. AI offers myriad ways to expedite technological evolution, including task automation, data analysis, predictive modeling, revolutionary advancements in healthcare and drug discovery, optimization of manufacturing and supply chains, natural language processing, idea generation, simulation creation, and personalized user experiences on a global scale.
On a personal level, the AI revolution promises to significantly increase our free time. How do we use this opportunity to determine society's future? My upcoming book, Emotional Reasoning: Insight into the Conscious Experience, discusses the nature of consciousness and other fascinating questions about human behavior and the anticipation of artificial consciousness.
The book Emotional Reasoning: Insight into the Conscious Experience is published on August 30, 2024.
To order:
Amazon Books
Copyright © 2024 by Eva Deli
Tuesday, February 20, 2024
Emotional Reasoning: Insight into the Conscious Experience
Beginning with Pauli, exploring the physical world has inspired many physicists to contemplate the mind as a physical entity. Inversely, a broad range of scientific disciplines, including psychology and neuroscience, turned to physics for a deeper understanding.
Adept response to stimuli requires a profound grasp of the physical world's organizational principles and governing laws. Our intrinsic intuition facilitates our adaptation to the environment, enabling thinking and behavior. The operational structure observed in the physical world is also part of our psychology.
In a thought-provoking journey, Emotional Reasoning pushes the boundaries of understanding the mind and emotions. The author turns to physics to formulate a new vision of consciousness as an irreducible entity (similar to particles, the fundamental units of energy or matter). The fermionic mind hypothesis emerges as a tour-de-force synthesis and framework of consciousness, the elemental unit of intellect. It highlights particle organization, a fundamental structure that cannot be understood as the sum of its parts, as the essential analogy between fermions and consciousness.
Engaging and penetrating, Emotional Reasoning represents a groundbreaking perspective that will surprise you at every turn. It will enhance your confidence through understanding yourself and your place in the cosmic order. Beyond neuroscience, the book holds profound implications for artificial intelligence research. It reveals the intricate link between consciousness and the physical universe, echoing the philosophical insight of John Wheeler. "The physical world is, in some deep sense, tied to the human being."
The publication date for Emotional Reasoning: Insight into the Conscious Experience was August 30, 2024.
Order:











